HLN Consulting LLC
  • About
    • About HLN
    • Our History
    • Clients
    • Careers
  • Solutions
    • Informatics Solutions
    • Case Studies
    • ICE
    • DMI
    • VPAS
  • Knowledge
    • Articles
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Collaborations
    • Newsletters
    • Presentations
    • Press Releases
    • White Papers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

BLOG
CDC Issues National Test Collaborative RFI

BY Noam Arzt ON December 5, 2018
CDC | Clinical Decision Support (CDS) | EHR/PHR | Open Source

In October the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a Request for Information (RFI) for a Natural Test Collaborative (NTC). Through a series of questions, the RFI seeks opinions and information about “The development of a national testbed (notionally called the National Test Collaborative (NTC)) for real-world testing of health information technology (IT)” and “Approaches for creating a sustainable infrastructure” to achieve it. The scope of the questions is somewhat confusing and quite broad, starting with Clinical Decision Support (CDS) and electronic Clinical Quality Measures (eCQMs) but quickly expanding to Electronic Health Records (EHR) and interoperability (not precisely defined).

The context for this RFI is equally confusing. It appears that on the one hand this is an extension of a CDC project called Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age which started with an RFI in 2016 (see HLN’s response) and culminated in a five-day meeting whose purpose was to share ideas about how clinical guidelines could be better applied to patient care. This would explain the initial scope as being related to CDS/eCQMs. On the other hand, there is some indication that CDC issued this RFI on behalf of itself and other sister agencies within Health and Human Services (HHS) because it had the administrative infrastructure and experience to issue it via FedBizOps more nimbly than other parts of the Department.

I find it odd that CDC did not even mention NIST in its background information in this RFI, especially given that NIST is its major partner not only with respect to CDS testing but also interoperability testing to support Meaningful Use. These are the closest thing to a national test bed in HIT that we have. I also find it odd that CDC did not mention the SMART project or its application sandbox as a prime example of an open source test bed. But the prospect of a national test bed for all health IT seems complicated, costly, and probably ill-advised. It is more realistic and feasible for CDC and HHS to better understand what is already in play and build on the experience of others. Health IT development and support is so distributed in the United States that standards for testing may be ambitious enough.

Responses to the RFI were due on December 20, 2018, and HLN participated in developing the response submitted by the American Medial Informatics Association (AMIA).

See my related case study on immunization evaluation and forecasting systems in OpenHealthNews: How are Clinical Decision Support Artifacts Tested Today?

Send us feedback about this blog

    HLN Consulting, LLC
    9 Pemberly
    Mission Viejo, CA 92692
    info@hln.com
    858-538-2220
    GSA

    Newsletter Sign-up

      Home
      About
      Solutions
      Clients
      Blog
      Careers
      Contact Us
      HLN Brochure 2020HLN Brochure
      Download ICE BrochureICE Brochure
      Knowledge & Resources
      Newsletters
      Contract Vehicles Privacy Policy Cookie Policy

      Copyright © 2023
      HLN Consulting, LLC